ÐÂÎűêÌ⣺³£ÊìÔÚÄÄѧsatºÃ
³£ÊìsatÊdz£ÊìsatÅàѵѧУµÄÖØµãרҵ£¬³£ÊìÊÐÖªÃûµÄsatÅàѵ»ú¹¹£¬½ÌÓýÅàѵ֪ÃûÆ·ÅÆ£¬³£ÊìsatÅàѵѧУʦ×ÊÁ¦Á¿ÐÛºñ£¬È«¹ú¸÷´ó³ÇÊоùÉèÓзÖУ£¬Ñ§Ð£»¶ÓÄãµÄ¼ÓÈë¡£
³£ÊìsatÅàѵѧУ·Ö²¼³£ÊìÊеȵØ,Êdz£ÊìÊм«¾ßÓ°ÏìÁ¦µÄsatÅàѵ»ú¹¹¡£
in favor of Ö§³Ö¡¡£¬ÔÞͬ¡¡µÄ
He spoke at the meeting in favor of the plan.
ËûÔÚ»áÉÏ·¢ÑÔÔ޳ɼƻ®¡£
Most educators are in favor of distance learning.
¶àÊý½ÌÓý¼ÒÖ§³ÖÔ¶³Ì½ÌÓý
1. The most important days of our lives are those in which we learn something new about ourselves. Jesse Pharios
¡¡¡¡Larke likes the pop music.
¡¡¡¡À¿Ëϲ»¶Á÷ÐÐÒôÀÖ¡£
¡¡¡¡£¨¶¯´ÊÓõ¥ÊýµÚÈýÈ˳ÆÐÎʽ£©
¡¡¡¡Larke has nothing to do today.
¡¡¡¡À¿Ë½ñÌìûʲôÊÂÒª×ö¡££¨do ÓÃÔÐΣ©
¡¡¡¡·ÇνÓﶯ´ÊµÄÌØÕ÷£º
¡¡¡¡2 Èç¹û·ÇνÓﶯ´ÊÊǼ°Îﶯ´Ê£¬ºóÃæÐë¸ú±öÓï¡£
ÕâÎå¸öµ¥´Ê»ò´Ê×éÈôÔÚ¾ä×ÓÖгöÏÖ£¬¾ÍÒªÊ×ÏÈ¿¼ÂǿɱÈÐÔµÄÎÊÌâ¡£
ÕýÈ·´ð°¸£ºE
In the literary world, success is measured by the number of books sold. Authors who sell millions of books are valued morethan those who sell hundreds of books, so it appears that worth, in this case, is best judged by a writer's productivity. This scenario, however, is misleading, since one writer may produce a single work that becomes a best-seller in comparison to another writer who produces dozens of works each of which sell a limited number. Which writer truly has more worth? A specific example o illustrate this scenario is Bill Clinton compared to Judy Blume. Clinton recently published his memories, which will likely be very successful and become a best-seller. Blume, the author of many books for teenagers, probably hasn't and won't ever appear on the best-seller list. Is Clinton worth more because his name and political career make his book successful? Or is Blume worth more because her portrayals of teen life affect many meaningful criteria of judging worth.
¡¾·ÖÎö¡¿
×ÜÓÐÈË»áÎÊÔõÑùѧӢÓïЧ¹û±È½ÏºÃ£¬ÆäʵÕâ¸öÎÊÌâÊÇûÓÐͳһµÄ´ð°¸µÄ£¬ÕâÀïÓÐһЩѧϰӢÓïµÄ½¨Ò飬ϣÍûÄܶԴó¼ÒÓÐËù°ïÖú¡£
(A)and omitting needless words
ÍþÁ®×öÊ´ÓÀ´²»´Ò棬Ëû×ÜÊÇ´Ó´ÓÈÝÈݵØ×öÿһ¼þÊ¡£
3.to talk over : (to discuss. Consider)
¡¾ËµÃ÷£º¡¿to talk over£¨½²×ù£¬ÉÌÁ¿£©Ö¸½²×ù¡¢»áÉÌÉÐδʵʩµÄ¼Æ»®»òÎÊÌ⣬»òÒÔÉÌ̸˵·þ£¬Ê¹±ðÈËÔÞ³É×Ô¼ºµÄ¼Æ»®¡£ºóÃæµÄÊÜ´ÊÈç¹ûÊÇÃû´Ê£¬Ó¦·ÅÔÚoverÖ®ºó£¬Èç¹ûÊÇ´úÃû´Ê£¬Ôò·ÅÔÚover֮ǰ£¬ÈçMy husband talked me over. £¨ÎÒµÄÕÉ·ò˵·þÁËÎÒ¡££©
¡¾Àý£º¡¿
(1)We talked over Mr. Reese¡¯s plan but could not come to a decision.
2002Äê5ÔÂ11ÈÕ£¬º×±Úúҵ¼¯ÍŹŵäÒÕÊõ²©Îï¹Ý¾ÙÐÐÂ¡ÖØ¿ª¹ÝÒÇʽ¡£Í¼ÎªÉϼ¶Á쵼Ϊ¿ª¹Ý¼ô²Ê¡£
SAT¶ÔƽÐнṹµÄÒªÇó·Ç³£Ñϸñ£¬Í¬Ê±£¬Ò²·Ç³£ÇàíùƽÐнṹ¡£×ݹÛÀú½ìÕæÌ⣬ƽÐнṹÊÇSATÎÄ·¨ÊÔÌâµÄ±Ø¿¼ÄÚÈÝÖ®Ò»¡£
³ýÁËÕâ¸öÔ˶¯£¬Í¬Ê±´úµÄ»¹ÓÐÄêÇáÈ˵ķ´Ô½Õ½Ô˶¯£¬´óѧÉúµÄÒªÇó×ÔÖÎÔ˶¯£¬¸¾Å®µÄÒªÇ󯽵ÈÔ˶¯µÈµÈ¡¡ÔÚÕâЩÔ˶¯µÄÓ°ÏìÏ£¬µ±Ê±µÄÃÀ¹úÉç»á³ÊÏÖ³öÍêÈ«²»Í¬µÄ·çò¡£Òò´Ë£¬ÎÒÃÇÒªÁ˽âÃÀ¹ú£¬¾Í²»Äܲ»Á˽âÕâ¶ÎÃÀ¹úÄêÇáÈËÒÔÌìÏÂΪ¼ºÈΡ¢²ÎÓëµÞÔìÀúÊ·µÄÌØÊâʱÆÚ¡£
ÐéÄâÓïÆø
ÐéÄâÌõ¼þ¾äµÄ»ù±¾½á¹¹¼°ÆäÓ÷¨
ÓëÏÖÔÚÊÂʵÏà·´µÄÐéÄâÌõ¼þ¾ä
Óë¹ýÈ¥ÊÂʵÏà·´µÄÐéÄâÌõ¼þ¾ä
Ó뽫À´ÊÂʵÏà·´µÄÐéÄâÌõ¼þ¾ä
.ÐéÄâÓïÆøµÄ»îÓÃ
ʱ¼ä´í×ÛÐéÄâ½á¹¹
Ê¡ÂÔifµÄÐéÄâ½á¹¹
²¢ÁÐÁ¬´Ê»ò¸±´Ê°µÊ¾µÄÐéÄâ½á¹¹
½é´Ê»ò½é´Ê¶ÌÓﰵʾµÄÐéÄâ½á¹¹
as if / as though·½Ê½×´Óï´Ó¾äÖеÄÐéÄâÓïÆø
Ãû´ÊÐÔ´Ó¾äÖеÄÐéÄâÓïÆø
·Ö´Ê¶ÌÓﰵʾµÄÐéÄâ½á¹¹
ÉÏÏÂÎÄÓï¾³ÖеÄÐéÄâ½á¹¹
¡¾ÖªÊ¶µã¹éÄÉ¡¿
I.Çé̬¶¯´Ê
±íʾ¡°ÄÜÁ¦¡¢Ðí¿É¡±µÄcan /may
±íʾÄÜÁ¦µÄÇé̬¶¯´ÊÓÃcan/could
A computer_____think for itself, it must be told what to do.
A.can¡¯t B.couldn¡¯t C.may not D.might not
±íʾÐí¿ÉʱÓÃmay/might ,can/could ¶¼¿ÉÒÔ£¬µ«ÔÚÎʾäÖÐÓÃcould¡?
exhibits adequate but inconsistent facility in the use of language, using generally appropriate vocabularydemonstrates some variety in sentence structure
ÁíÍâÒ»¸öÖµµÃÎÒÃÇ×¢ÒâµÄ·½ÃæÊÇ£¬SATµÄ¸Ä½ø¾ä×ӵĴíÎóÑ¡ÏîÖУ¬´íÎóÍùÍù²»Ö¹Ò»¸ö¡£
±¾¶Î½áÊøÊ±£¬Ò²¾ÍÊÇÈ«ÎĽáÊøÊ±£¬ÓÃÁË¡°that is why I agree with the idea that£«Öظ´Ö÷Ìâ˼Ï롱ÕâÑùµÄģʽ½øÐÐÈ«ÎÄ×ܽᣬҲÔٴεãÌ⣬·Ç³£ÓÐÁ¦¡£
ÁíÍâÒ»¸öÖµµÃÎÒÃÇ×¢ÒâµÄ·½ÃæÊÇ£¬SATµÄ¸Ä½ø¾ä×ӵĴíÎóÑ¡ÏîÖУ¬´íÎóÍùÍù²»Ö¹Ò»¸ö¡£
Just last week I received an invitation, via email, to plug a product which wouldheat my swimming pool, if I had one, which I do not.
Òò´Ë£¬´ÕÊýÑ¡ÏîµÄÎÊÌâÊDZȽÏÈÝÒ׿´³öÀ´µÄ¡£
³£ÊìsatÅàѵѧУ³É¾ÍÄãµÄÃÎÏëÖ®Âá£Ñ§sat¾ÍÀ´³£ÊìsatÅàѵѧУ
Åàѵ×Éѯµç»°£ºµã»÷×ó²àÀëÏß±¦Ãâ·Ñ×Éѯ